ISO50

The day T-Mobile owns Magenta is the day I’m puking in a box and sending it to them. How annoying and disappointing

HAHAHA This is nuts!!

I say when we get stuff printed in magenta we should add 0000000.1% Cyan in then if they try anything just claim its not magenta!!!

© The colour C 0000000.1% / M 100% / Y 0% / K 0% is owned by Wallace Henning, any use of it will result in legal action!

HAHAHA

I’ve heard about this already and it’s so sad. I didn’t know (neither imagine) until then that you can actually own a color. But it seems to be true in the EU! There a very strange things happening with Copyright in the European Union at the moment (and not only concerning colors).

It has rosen attention in the netherlands now because Telekom is claiming to be the owner of the color in the whole EU. But in Germany (where I come from, I’m so sorry) they have been sueing for some time already.

They sue everything, including companies and people that are miles away from the communication sector. They sued publishers for using Magenta in their books (yes, really!) giving as reason that they themselves publish the phone book so only they have the right to use the color in printing.

In other cases they say that the company in question sells something over the internet or has a web site, and – in Telekom words – everything that has to with Internet is therefore neccessarily going over there services (with is obviously not true) and so they forbid the use of the color.

Sadly enough, most people give in, when sued by them. As far as I know, there has not been one single lawsuit that actually prohibited the use of the color, at least in such ridiculous cases as the ones aboce. But I know from people that had a lawsuit with them (a three man publisher start up, what a threat for a multi-billion dollar world wide operating communication provider!). Big T lost every lawsuit and appealed against the judgement every time again up until the highest instance. Then, when it is obvious that they will lose again, they withdraw the action one day before the judgement. This way they prevent the case from becoming a test case, and as there wasn’t any judgement the defendant has to bear all his expenses himself even though he was clearly to win – leaving many of them financially ruined afterwards.

I can see why they claim some protection of their individual company image. But this particular behaviour is just silly. The best way of being indivudual is through creativity, and not through a lawsuit.

Sometimes I really think the world is going crazy …

In case you haven’t heard, I own Oxygen guys. So… stop breathing my air. Thanks.

I am pretty sure this is just within their industry. Sweet n’ Low, Splenda, Pepsi trademarked their colors, doesn’t mean you can’t use them, just not in branding within the same industry.

I could be wrong, but this is just my understanding of the matter.

Scott-

That scares the bejesus out of me. Could they really win that case? From what I’ve heard, others have failed.

Anyway, thanks for the insight.

Insane…
I’m a web developer (Mexican) working in France with the site #1 of e-commerce of luxury food products.
A few months ago we receive a package full of non-sense papers claiming that we where breaking the law with some of the displayed products because the item included the vichy pattern(tiled grid backround of RED and WHITE) where a registered trademark of bonne maman confitures…
30 small business payed where send to court and we taked out all the products with similar design.
This was a traditional tissue used in france since 200 years… now it’s privated and nobody can use the tiled red and white background (and when they talk about red they talk from all the possible reds).