<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10/GUI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/</link>
	<description>The blog of Scott Hansen (aka ISO50 / Tycho)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:05:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flavio</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-160757</link>
		<dc:creator>Flavio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-160757</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not a touch fanatic too, but i often desire to have a trackpad near the spacebar so i like the idea of the great touch area, btw it doesn&#039;t look functional, i&#039;m now accustomed to OSX but... sometime having apps at fullscreen is nice, here they don&#039;t demonstrate that. The feeling it gives me is of oppression. I feel a better direction would be the multi-desktop approach, making it a dynamic instance of the workspace, tying every app to a new desktop.

About the graphic editor you obviously are worried about, i think it wouldn&#039;t be difficult to implement also a wacom-like tech so we would use a pen for precision tasks.
In the coming years we&#039;ll also have better writing recognition sw, so it would be possible to use that as an input. we&#039;re faster with a keyb but that could be intersting in given environments (taking notes at a school lesson with a current laptop is a nightmare), and finally signing a pdf invoice could be done without printing anything and scanning it back ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not a touch fanatic too, but i often desire to have a trackpad near the spacebar so i like the idea of the great touch area, btw it doesn&#8217;t look functional, i&#8217;m now accustomed to OSX but&#8230; sometime having apps at fullscreen is nice, here they don&#8217;t demonstrate that. The feeling it gives me is of oppression. I feel a better direction would be the multi-desktop approach, making it a dynamic instance of the workspace, tying every app to a new desktop.</p>
<p>About the graphic editor you obviously are worried about, i think it wouldn&#8217;t be difficult to implement also a wacom-like tech so we would use a pen for precision tasks.<br />
In the coming years we&#8217;ll also have better writing recognition sw, so it would be possible to use that as an input. we&#8217;re faster with a keyb but that could be intersting in given environments (taking notes at a school lesson with a current laptop is a nightmare), and finally signing a pdf invoice could be done without printing anything and scanning it back <img src='http://blog.iso50.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-160107</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-160107</guid>
		<description>So uh, everybody seen the new Mac mouse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So uh, everybody seen the new Mac mouse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Kissinger</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159839</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Kissinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159839</guid>
		<description>I had a car accident last year which left me with only 2 fingers on both hands. What happens then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a car accident last year which left me with only 2 fingers on both hands. What happens then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159816</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159816</guid>
		<description>I can see this being of great workflow benefit in applications that attempt to replicate interfaces that already exist in the real world (like a mixing console). But for visual arts and graphic design, I&#039;m not so sure. As has been mentioned, the mouse gives stability. Unless I can convince my clients that a finger-painting style is what best represents their company&#039;s image, I&#039;m not sure it works for me in graphic applications. I do, however, think that as a system for interfacing the OS, the multi-touch pad will be better. Though by the time it begins to gain acceptance I&#039;m wondering how far along holographic light will have come, not only as a means of displaying information but as a means of containing information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see this being of great workflow benefit in applications that attempt to replicate interfaces that already exist in the real world (like a mixing console). But for visual arts and graphic design, I&#8217;m not so sure. As has been mentioned, the mouse gives stability. Unless I can convince my clients that a finger-painting style is what best represents their company&#8217;s image, I&#8217;m not sure it works for me in graphic applications. I do, however, think that as a system for interfacing the OS, the multi-touch pad will be better. Though by the time it begins to gain acceptance I&#8217;m wondering how far along holographic light will have come, not only as a means of displaying information but as a means of containing information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159815</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159815</guid>
		<description>The beginning of this presentation addresses all of the issues that are normally ignored by mouse replacement bids. Great job there.

However, I don&#039;t see how this application/window juggling is any more efficient than tabbing through. It actually seems MORE tedious. The finger number designations go down a road of increasing limitation that just doesn&#039;t align with intuition. I am not looking for a way to manage windows faster - I think most of us heavy users have that down. 

However, the fingers on the desktop on a pad scenario answers so many problems that always come to mind when touch screen comes up in the conversation. 

I&#039;d also like to see electric pulse shape switching (what&#039;s the proper term for this - it&#039;s where a current passes through a medium, changing the shape?)  to toggle the surface texture between small depressions or bumps for keyboard and perfectly flat for full-screen manipulation.

I must add that I think MODO would be a mind-blowing design experience with this interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beginning of this presentation addresses all of the issues that are normally ignored by mouse replacement bids. Great job there.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t see how this application/window juggling is any more efficient than tabbing through. It actually seems MORE tedious. The finger number designations go down a road of increasing limitation that just doesn&#8217;t align with intuition. I am not looking for a way to manage windows faster &#8211; I think most of us heavy users have that down. </p>
<p>However, the fingers on the desktop on a pad scenario answers so many problems that always come to mind when touch screen comes up in the conversation. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see electric pulse shape switching (what&#8217;s the proper term for this &#8211; it&#8217;s where a current passes through a medium, changing the shape?)  to toggle the surface texture between small depressions or bumps for keyboard and perfectly flat for full-screen manipulation.</p>
<p>I must add that I think MODO would be a mind-blowing design experience with this interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottluuk</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159793</link>
		<dc:creator>ottluuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159793</guid>
		<description>As much as I love the multitouch features on my shiny little MacBook, I don&#039;t think juggling a million windows around however elegantly could help anyone&#039;s workflow. 

Working with a ton of open apps just divides your attention to the point where you lose productivity compared to doing everything one by one. When I really need to get something done, I log out of chat, kill the twitter app, minimize Mail and when possible, use the fullscreen option of the App that I need. Switching windows and issuing menu commands is already fast enough. it&#039;s the brain that lags behind. Without concentration, all I produce is crap anyway.

These hyper-multitouch ideas won&#039;t get flight before they become implemented inside a range of apps (where you do the actual work) and work consistently across them. 

Until then, I will be happy to remain rather keyboard-centric (I don&#039;t do much drawing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I love the multitouch features on my shiny little MacBook, I don&#8217;t think juggling a million windows around however elegantly could help anyone&#8217;s workflow. </p>
<p>Working with a ton of open apps just divides your attention to the point where you lose productivity compared to doing everything one by one. When I really need to get something done, I log out of chat, kill the twitter app, minimize Mail and when possible, use the fullscreen option of the App that I need. Switching windows and issuing menu commands is already fast enough. it&#8217;s the brain that lags behind. Without concentration, all I produce is crap anyway.</p>
<p>These hyper-multitouch ideas won&#8217;t get flight before they become implemented inside a range of apps (where you do the actual work) and work consistently across them. </p>
<p>Until then, I will be happy to remain rather keyboard-centric (I don&#8217;t do much drawing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don G.</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159791</link>
		<dc:creator>Don G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159791</guid>
		<description>I think the overall concept of multitouch is absolutely going to shake things up in the (near) future. Apple has partly proven this with their 2-finger approach on the iPhone and trackpads. 

But. I like my windows scattered around the desktop(s), so why try to change that? Why can&#039;t I use the same type multitouch commandos to greatly enhance my control over my current OS? I don&#039;t want your engineer-approach to computing. 

So, I think the winning formula won&#039;t try to enforce a new GUI on you, but rather empower your existing OS. Multitouch FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the overall concept of multitouch is absolutely going to shake things up in the (near) future. Apple has partly proven this with their 2-finger approach on the iPhone and trackpads. </p>
<p>But. I like my windows scattered around the desktop(s), so why try to change that? Why can&#8217;t I use the same type multitouch commandos to greatly enhance my control over my current OS? I don&#8217;t want your engineer-approach to computing. </p>
<p>So, I think the winning formula won&#8217;t try to enforce a new GUI on you, but rather empower your existing OS. Multitouch FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAVIS</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159786</link>
		<dc:creator>NAVIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159786</guid>
		<description>Looks pretty rad and will be cool to see the progress of this technology but honestly... it just looks more complicated. Like others have said, there seems to be a bit of a learning curve. I love Expose on my Mac. Not sure how you can simplify that. I&#039;m sure there is a way but this just seems to be a bit much. At the beginning of the video it sounded great but as the video played out... I felt very turned off by it. 

Ultimately, I&#039;d like to be able to crawl into my monitor and warp to do my searches on Planet Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty rad and will be cool to see the progress of this technology but honestly&#8230; it just looks more complicated. Like others have said, there seems to be a bit of a learning curve. I love Expose on my Mac. Not sure how you can simplify that. I&#8217;m sure there is a way but this just seems to be a bit much. At the beginning of the video it sounded great but as the video played out&#8230; I felt very turned off by it. </p>
<p>Ultimately, I&#8217;d like to be able to crawl into my monitor and warp to do my searches on Planet Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lll</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159770</link>
		<dc:creator>lll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159770</guid>
		<description>I see some similarities between the palm pre - that&#039;s a good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see some similarities between the palm pre &#8211; that&#8217;s a good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.iso50.com/2009/10/14/10gui/#comment-159769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iso50.com/?p=11238#comment-159769</guid>
		<description>Imagine what the six-fingered man could do with this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine what the six-fingered man could do with this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
